Monday, February 27, 2023

 

Raising Godly Children

Deuteronomy 6:1–9

1   "Now this is the commandment, the statutes and the rules that the LORD your God commanded me to teach you, that you may do them in the land to which you are going over, to possess it,2 that you may fear the LORD your God, you and your son and your son's son, by keeping all his statutes and his commandments, which I command you, all the days of your life, and that your days may be long.3 Hear therefore, O Israel, and be careful to do them, that it may go well with you, and that you may multiply greatly, as the LORD, the God of your fathers, has promised you, in a land flowing with milk and honey.

Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one.5 You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might.6 And these words that I command you today shall be on your heart.7 You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise.8 You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes.9 You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.

 

Marx and Engels in the Communist Manifesto said, "We will replace home education with social education."

I. The Great Revelation

First of all, this great revelation: "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord."

A. I Believe in God Because Creation Demands It

B. I Believe in God Because Scripture Declares It

What would you say to someone who  says to you, "Prove there's a God."

What are the effects of secular humanism in our nation?

II. The Great Responsibility

"7 You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise.8 You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes.9 You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates."

What responsibilities has God has given to parents, and primarily to dads?   (Deuteronomy 6:2)

Fathers are to be male models to their sons. In the love they have towards God. How is this best displayed?

In A Sincere Love

In A Selfless

In A Strong Love  

What  is the curriculum are you to teach?  How can you teach this well?  (Deuteronomy 6:6–7)

How are we to teach the Word of God?

1.Teach the Word of God Consistently  7 –diligently ..  How may this be done in the home?

2. Teach the Word of God Compellingly How may this be done effectively?

Note: children ask questions.   20 "When your son asks you in time to come, 'What is the meaning of the testimonies and the statutes and the rules that the LORD our God has commanded you?

What do each of these places and times to teach children indicate to you?

[You] shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise.8 You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes.9 You shall write them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates.  (Deuteronomy 6:7–9)

3. Teach the Word of God Creatively

Some children learn artistically. Some learn by reading, others learn by talking or listening, some learn while walking, others learn while doing activities. How do your children learn best?

How do you adjust your teaching methods to take advantage of this?

 

 


Friday, February 24, 2023

 

2 Ways To Live

In the beginning God created the heavens and earth Gen 1:1

It is impossible, to disprove God's existence. Most philosophers and scientists agree that you cannot conclusively disprove the existence of God, because it is almost impossible to prove a "universal negative." In fact, even many atheists would concede that it is impossible to prove that God does not exist.

It is not only religious people who believe things: everyone depends on certain beliefs. Christians have beliefs. Atheists have beliefs. Even agnostics have beliefs. Faith involves belief and trust. Yet faith and reason do not by definition exclude each other; they can in fact be complementary. The Bible does not lead us towards a faith devoid of reason. Alongside the centrality of the heart and will, the New Testament also emphasizes reason and the life of the mind.

Gen 1:26,27 Then God said, "Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth." God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.

The terms of what constitutes rational proof are to be understood.

Jesus said, "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind" (Matthew 22:37). Jesus Himself said, "I am the truth" (John 14:6). Likewise, when Paul was on trial accused of being insane, he said, "I am not insane… What I am saying is true and reasonable" (Acts 26:25). Paul affirmed a rational basis for his belief in Jesus, and he often spoke about his "belief in the truth" (2 Thessalonians 2:13).

To be a Christian is to believe in the truth; there is rationality to faith. For this reason, the apostle Peter writes, "Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have" (1 Peter 3:15).

The apostle Paul made the assertion that, "Since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made" (Romans 1:20). He was clearly convinced of there being some sign or rumour of God in the creation itself. What is the evidence for this assertion?

 

Evidence from the fact that there is "something rather than nothing"

As we look at the world around us, it is natural to wonder why it is here, or where it came from. Modern science has actually sharpened that question for us. "The existence of the Big Bang begs the question of what came before that, and who or what was responsible." Einstein accepted that the universe did have a beginning and the implication of "the presence of a superior reasoning power,"

Astrophysicist Robert Jawstrow wrote:

At this moment it seems as though science will never be able to raise the curtain on the mystery of creation… Now we see how the astronomical evidence leads to a biblical view of the origin of the world. The details differ, but the essential elements and the astronomical and biblical accounts of Genesis are the same; the chain of events leading to man commenced suddenly and sharply at a definite moment in time, in a flash of light and energy.

 

Evidence from the "fine tuning" of the universe

Professor Anthony Flew was one of the most influential rationalist atheist philosophers and the mentor to my Philosophy teacher and mentor Ron Laura.  But in 2004, he changed his mind. The Church Times said, "Flew… abandoned his life-long commitment to atheism and he now accepts that God exists. In his own words he 'simply had to go where the evidence leads' and recognize that 'the case for God is now much stronger than it was before.'"

Evidence of the nature of human beings

If things just are, as some atheists claim, then there cannot be absolute right and absolute wrong. But in that case, where does this innate sense of right and wrong that we all seem to carry within us—whether Christian, agnostic, or atheist—come from? Paul says that it is the way we are created. God made us with a conscience. He writes that the requirements of the law are written on our hearts. Sometimes they accuse and sometimes they defend us, because we have a conscience (Romans 2:15).

For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God Rom 3:23

 

Another compelling piece of evidence to do with human nature is the longing that many find within themselves for something transcendent. St. Augustine (ad 354–430) said, "You formed us for yourself and our hearts are restless until they find their rest in you."14 This is the evidence of experience, the emptiness that is in every human heart. Deep down we know that material things alone cannot satisfy, and that even human relationships are not enough.

 

the wages of sin is death Rom 6:23

C. S. Lewis pointed out, "Such wish fulfilment would likely give rise to a very different kind of God than the one described in the Bible." The God of holiness and justice, who calls His followers to costly obedience and discipleship, teaching love, and forgiveness, even of enemies, is certainly not the wished-for God of all and sundry!  Of course, wishing for something does not guarantee the existence or non-existence of that something. When St. Augustine reflected on the God-shaped hole in every human heart, he was not suggesting that what is wished for must exist (though he certainly thinks it is a clue). Rather, St. Augustine is pointing us to look at the peace, rest, and joy that Christians testify to time and again in relationship with God.

 

For God so loved the world that He gave His only Son

Evidence of God the Liberator

People who profess Christian faith today can look not only to the evidence of creation and of human nature, but also to the historical life of Jesus Christ. John Stott has written:  God is partly revealed in the ordered loveliness of the created universe. He is partly revealed in history and in experience, the human conscience, and the human consciousness… Nevertheless, God's full and final self-revelation… has been given in and through Jesus alone.… That is the reason why every enquiry into the truth of Christianity must begin with the historic Jesus.

Evidence of the life of Jesus

No one seriously doubts the fact that there is a great deal of evidence for Jesus' existence. This comes not only from the Gospels and other Christian writings, but also from non-Christian sources. For example, the Roman historian Tacitus wrote that, "Christ, from whom they [Christians] got their name, suffered the extreme penalty [ie, the crucifixion] during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate."   There is plenty of evidence both inside and outside the New Testament for the existence of Jesus.

Christ died for our sins.., that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day  1Cor 15:3,4 

 

 

 

Evidence for the death and resurrection of Jesus

Jesus Christ's physical resurrection from the dead is the cornerstone of Christianity. For myself, it was through the life, death, and in particular the resurrection of Jesus, that I came to believe that there is a God. Christians come to know who God is through these events of history into which God has entered.

Evidence of God the Transformer

For many people the most impressive evidence for the existence of God is the reality of transformed lives and transformed communities. The apostle Paul wrote, "We… are being transformed into his image with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit" (2 Corinthians 3:18).

Evidence of the transformed lives of Paul and the apostles

In the eighteenth century, two eminent lawyers, both atheists, Lord Lyttleton and Gilbert West, were absolutely determined to destroy the Christian faith. They made an agreement between them that they would do this by undermining two things: the resurrection of Jesus Christ and the conversion of St. Paul.  He sifted the evidence for the resurrection from a legal standpoint, and he finally become satisfied that Jesus was raised from the dead in the way the Gospels described.

Lord Lyttleton's book was entitled Observations on the Conversion and Apostleship of St. Paul., "The conversion and apostleship of St. Paul alone duly considered is in itself demonstration sufficient to prove Christianity to be a divine revelation."

Evidence of transformed lives and communities

The countless examples of transformed lives in church history and of today offer further evidence of the rationality of faith. The conversion of St. Augustine and the conversion of John Wesley number among them. Personally, I have heard innumerable stories of people whose lives have been transformed  at our church and around the world.

Francis Collins, former leader of the Human Genome Project, is one of today's leading scientists. Raised by freethinking parents, he became first an agnostic and then an atheist. He worked in medicine and recounts what happened:

"I was raised by… freethinking parents… for whom religion was just not very important.… I became first an agnostic and then an atheist… One afternoon, a kindly grandmother with only a few weeks to live shared her own faith in Jesus quite openly with me, and then asked, "Doctor, what do you believe?"… I fled the room, having the disturbing sense that the atheist ice under my feet was cracking, though I wasn't quite sure why. And then suddenly the reason for my disquiet hit me: I was a scientist. I was supposed to make decisions based on evidence. And yet I had never really considered the evidence for and against faith. As I explored the evidence more deeply, all around me I began to see signposts to something outside of nature that could only be called God. I realized that the scientific methods can really only answer questions about HOW things work. It can't answer questions about WHY—and those are in fact the most important ones. Why is there something instead of nothing? Why does mathematics work so beautifully to describe nature? Why is the universe so precisely tuned to make life possible? Why do we humans have a universal sense of right and wrong and an urge to do right… Confronted with these revelations, I realized that my own assumption—that faith was the opposite of reason—was incorrect. I should have known better: Scripture defines faith as "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." Evidence! Simultaneously, I realized that atheism was in fact the least rational of all choices… How could I have had the arrogance to make such an assertion? After searching for two years more, I ultimately found my own answer—in the loving person of Jesus Christ. Here was a man unlike any other. He was humble and kindhearted. He reached out to those considered lowest in society. He made astounding statements about loving your enemies. And He promised something that no ordinary man should be able to promise —to forgive sins. On top of all that having assumed all my life that Jesus was just a myth, I was astounded to learn that the evidence for His historical existence was actually overwhelming. Eventually, I concluded the evidence demanded a verdict. In my 28th year, I could no longer deny my need for forgiveness and new life—and I gave in and became a follower of Jesus. He is now the rock upon which I stand, the source for me of ultimate love, peace, joy, and hope. Time after time after time, all around the world, millions of people are experiencing the risen Christ today. This is evidence. It is not just individual lives that have been transformed, but whole communities.

 

Evidence of miraculous healing

Former cardiothoracic surgeon based at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital for over 25 years, Professor Hughes OA made significant contributions to aortic and coronary artery surgery and led surgical teams across Asia. He is also internationally recognised as a leader in the field of health care quality and safety, told us about the miraculous healing he observed of a heart surgery which went wrong, and how he and the staff observed visually the split heart arteries sew themselves together and then reattach themselves to the patient's heart in the minute before the patient should have died, without human intervention, in answer to prayer.

 

A friend, Dr. Ken Panten was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer, given only a month to live at most by a cancer surgeon.  After prayer he was completely healed by the next day.

 

The doctrine of creation gives meaning to the concept of beauty.

The doctrine of the fall explains why nothing is ever quite perfect —both in the created world and also in the human heart. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the great Russian novelist, wrote, "The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through every human heart, and through all human hearts."

The doctrine of salvation, that God stepped into human history in the Person of His Son, to provide the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and then be raised on the third day, gives evidence for the reality of our need of a Saviour and God's provision of that Saviour.

 

All that needs to be determined for you to enjoy salvation and a transformed life is for you to receive this Saviour as your Saviour.

This is a personal thing only you can do.

It is your decision.

 

John 3:16   that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

John 3:36  Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.

 

There is a line between faith and unbelief.                                         

Which side are you on?

Would you like to move from this side to this side?

Would you like to do this now?

 


Thursday, February 16, 2023

 

Focus on the Family Valentines Day Modelling A Magnificent Marriage

EPHESIANS 5:22-33  MARRIAGES THAT WORK.

Law and Grace Reading Genesis 2:15-25, 3:16-19

15       The LORD God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to work it and keep it.16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, "You may surely eat of every tree of the garden,17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die."

18       Then the LORD God said, "It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him."19 Now out of the ground the LORD God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature, that was its name.20 The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him.21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh.22 And the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man.23 Then the man said,

           "This at last is bone of my bones

                      and flesh of my flesh;

           she shall be called Woman,

                      because she was taken out of Man."

24       Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.25 And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed.

 

Genesis 3: 16         To the woman he said,

           "I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing;

                      in pain you shall bring forth children.

           Your desire shall be for your husband,

                      and he shall rule over you."

17       And to Adam he said,

           "Because you have listened to the voice of your wife

                      and have eaten of the tree

           of which I commanded you,

                      'You shall not eat of it,'

           cursed is the ground because of you;

                      in pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life;

18       thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you;

                      and you shall eat the plants of the field.

19       By the sweat of your face

                      you shall eat bread,

           till you return to the ground,

                      for out of it you were taken;

           for you are dust,

                      and to dust you shall return."

 

The priority of marriage.

The permanence of marriage. "Shall be joined to his wife" means "welded together." Mark 10:9

The purpose of marriage.

• companionship       • cooperation    • completion

• communication      • continuation

Nine differences between men and women

1. man is to be the provider and woman is to be the helper

2. the husband is the protector, the woman is the nurturer

3. the man is to be the leader and the woman is to be the enhancer

4. man is physically strong, the woman is more fragile

5. men approach problems head first and women approach things heart first

6. men tend to strive for achievement and women strive for security

7. a man sees his job as an extension of himself a woman sees the home as an extension of herself

8. a woman tends to be more sensitive and men tend to be insensitive

9. men tend to be defensive, women tend to be trusting

 

 

Mariane Holbrook wrote Valentines Day cards for Hallmark cards. Some got rejected.

-With all my heart I love you,     With all my heart I care;

I still have one big question, though,      "Do you still dye your hair?"

-You look so lovely in that dress  I even love your hat.

Is it okay to tell the world  You've gotten sorta fat?

-My valentine, I love you so,  You fill my heart with bliss.

If you'd just put your teeth in Then I might enjoy a kiss.

 

Tuesday last week was Valentine's Day.

It is a good opportunity to consider the place of love within the family unit, and specifically what love looks like within a family unit between parents. For as the parents go, so do the kids.

Churches must be more concerned with being true to the Word of God. Liberal churches are dying on the vine, while Bible-believing churches are growing. We're not primarily concerned about whether everybody likes our beliefs on marriage. But it is important that we be doing what God wants.

Husband and wife are equal in the eyes of God. Both bear God's image, but, in differing ways. The marriage relationship models the way God relates to His people.

A husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church. Christ died for the church.

God has given the responsibility to: provide, protect and lead the family to the husband.

The wife is to submit graciously to the servant leadership of the husband as the church willingly submits to the headship of Christ.

We need to understand the role of marriage from God's point of view. This is not settled by human propaganda, but by the Word of God. We have so many failed marriages because we have thrown away God's plan for marriage.

Marriage: contract or covenant? Marriage isn't a contract, where you try to protect your rights.

If you see marriage as a divine covenant, you'll accept your responsibilities. If you see marriage as a contract, you'll be looking for loopholes in the contract.

What we believe is based on the Word of God. The Bible is God's Word. It's not up for debate.

God's Word says a husband and father is responsible to his wife for three major things.

 

servant leadership (ephesians 5:21)

Submitting to one another in the fear of God.

The word "head" means "leader." The husband is not a dictator or a captain giving orders. This doesn't speak of a chain of command, but a line of responsibility. To have headship is to have responsibility. If a wife is to submit to her husband, she is to submit to her husband for loving leadership. Ephesians 5:23 is the model God has given for marriage.

A husband is the leader in the home, in the same way Christ is the head of the church.

Jesus Christ has never forced a believer to do anything. He leads and loves us to do many things.

He is the model for the husband.  To be "head" means responsible leadership.

Both the male and female bear God's image. Genesis 1:27

Both the male and female are individually heirs of the grace of life. 1 Peter 3:7

Both are equal in their standing before God if they are saved. Galatians 3:26 for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith.27 For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

We are all one in Christ; He does not divide based on race, gender or socioeconomic status.

While male and female are equal, they are not alike; God has given them different roles.

The devil attempts to make men and women alike under the guise of making them equal.

God made them male and female; the Bible is against he-women and she-men.

The tendency today is to stress the equality of men and women by minimizing the unique significance of maleness and femaleness.

Consequently, more divorce, homosexuality, sexual abuse, promiscuity, social awkwardness, emotional distress, and suicide.

Mankind has thrown away God‑given identity and the differences between the male and female.

Oneness and equality are not sameness.     God is for oneness, not sameness. God made us different that He might make us one.

Recognizing the headship of one spouse does not mean the inferiority of the other.

We are to be submissive to our boss at work; but this does not make us inferior to him.

We are to be submissive to a coach on a team; this does not mean we are inferior to him.

We are to be submissive to a teacher in a class; this does not mean we are inferior to him.

We are to be submissive to local authorities; this does not mean we are inferior to them.

It simply means that God has placed order in all society.

Sometimes we need to learn some things about life. I learnt something after a near collision with someone breaking the road rules on a roundabout near Windsor:

Here lies the body of Benjamin May      Who died defending the right of way

He was right – dead right, as he sped along,     But just as dead as if he were wrong!

Now there are a lot of husbands standing for their rights, but they are so wrong. They do it the wrong way and make a car wreck of their marriages.

The wife may be superior to the husband in many ways. But God holds the husband responsible for the home. Ultimately, the responsibility falls on the husband.

The problem in the world today is not primarily rebellious wives. The problem is slacker husbands who shirk their responsibility to love and lead their wives as Christ loved and led the church.

If the home is wrong, it's primarily because the man is wrong.

God held Adam responsible for Eve's sin in the Garden of Eden. Genesis 3:17 God held Adam responsible for not leading his home as he should have.

What is Servant Leadership? A leader serves. The husband is to love his wife as Christ loved the church.  For the husband to be the head of the wife means that he is to serve his wife.

Jesus is the head of the church, yet He washed His disciples' feet. John 13:13

Servant leadership is the way you show your headship in the home. The wife is not there to serve the husband, he is there to serve her.

A leader is gentle.  If you are a husband, you need to be a "gentle" man. Children love their fathers not just for their strength, but because they are gentle. If you want to have great kids and a great wife, be gentle with them.

A leader guides by example 1 Peter 5:1-3 Husbands are to lead, not because they have to, but willingly. Husbands have no right to ask anyone to do something they are not themselves willing to do. Or to believe a certain thing. Or to live a certain way.

As the husband, are you an example to your wife as Christ is to the Church?

A leader elicits the strengths of those that are lead. Husbands, your wife has gifts that you don't have.  

sacrificial love (ephesians 5:25-26)

Second, husbands are to love their wives sacrificially. Christ died for the church. You do not love your wife as the Bible teaches unless you have died for her (notice the past tense in this sentence). You do not love your wife as Christ loved the church unless you have died for your wife by dying to yourself.  Husbands are responsible to their wives for sacrificial love. A husband should be willing to die for his wife. Jesus modelled this sacrificial love when He gave Himself up for the church. Die to ego, pride, and ambition.      What does it mean for the husband to be head of the wife? First of all, it doesn't mean that he's to be her dictator. Any husband who thinks this needs to learn how Jesus made His Bride submissive by loving and dying for her.  If you are a husband, then when you got married, you gave up all rights to yourself. No longer can you make decisions based simply upon what you want. Her welfare must be considered. You are to love your wife selflessly. Sacrificial love is a protecting love. A husband wants to protect his body when it's in danger. So he is to protect his wife. You are to protect her because she is "the weaker vessel." 1 Peter 3:7 "Weaker vessel" does not mean inferior vessel. Silk is weaker than denim; silk is not inferior to denim. Porcelain is weaker than steel but not inferior to steel. With porcelain you can make a beautiful cup. With steel you can make a sledgehammer to drive a spike. The cup is weaker. Which is better? You can't drink tea out of a sledgehammer. You can't drive a wedge with a porcelain cup. God made us different, that He might make us one. God gave men, generally, a stronger frame and physiology. God gave men to protect his wife as Jesus protects the church.

Secondly, husbands are to love their wives sanctifyingly (Ephes 5:26). Husbands are to make their wives beautiful by helping them become all God wants them to be! You are to be her prophet and priest with intercessory prayer and teaching from His Word. Sacrificial love is a purifying love.

A husband's chief assignment from God is to make his wife a more radiant, beautiful Christian. He is to intercede for her, lead, teach, love, and protect her spiritually.

He should not encourage her in any impurity: to drink something that is wrong, to watch something that is wrong, to do anything that is wrong.

Thirdly, husbands are to love their wives satisfyingly (Eph 5:28). Husband, you are to anticipate your wife's needs and please your wife as you please your own body. The more you give, the more you're going to get. Be good to yourself; love your wife.  Sacrificial love is a providing love. Ephesians 5:29 "Cherish" means "to warm with body heat." "Nurture" means "to feed and mature."

Husbands are to love their wives supremely (Eph 5:30,31). A husband is to love his wife above all earthly relationships including his own parents and children. A husband is to love his wife above his business and hobbies, as well. The relationship between husband and wife is compared to the relationship of Christ and the church. Marriage is the highest of all human relationships. Sacrificial supreme love is a passionate love. This is not referring to sexual passion. But a husband should be willing to give himself up for his wife. Marriages need two funerals and one wedding. Both husband and wife die to themselves and come alive to Jesus Christ. When a man loves his wife passionately, there is nothing too precious for him to give up for her, except his relationship to Almighty God.  Give up the things that offend her. Don't watch Seal Team when she hates shoot-em-ups on TV.. try Gilmore Girls.. now that is a sacrifice!

Do not sacrifice your home on the altar of your job. Most women are willing to be in submission to a man who loves her enough to die for herDemonstrate that love by the way you live for her.

steadfast loyalty (ephesians 5:30-31)

"They two shall be one flesh" speaks of a blending not just of the body, but of the soul and the spirit until they become one.

Respect and love. The man is to give love, the woman is to give respect to her husband, because ultimately the Lord holds the husband responsible for the home.

When a wife chooses not to submit to her husband, she is going to have serious problems.

First, she is going to have a spiritual problem with God because He is the One who told her to submit. Second, she is going to have problems with her husband because he will not be able to assume his God-given role as initiator if his wife isn't in her God-given role as responder.

Third, she is going to have problems with her children. The woman who refuses to be under a husband's headship will never have authority over her children. I think this is a prime reason there is so much juvenile delinquency in America.

Finally, she is going to have trouble with herself. Every wife has certain needs that will never be met until she frees her husband to meet those needs by assuming his role as her provider, protector, and pray-er.

When a wife submits, she will experience true freedom — just like a train is most free when it stays on the tracks. A train will accomplish far more on the tracks than it will ever accomplish by trying to go through a meadow.

A home ought to be a little bit of the Garden of Eden, the only part we have left until Jesus comes.

Do you know Jesus personally? If not, you can pray to Him today by asking Him to come into your life.

Call upon Jesus today. Repent (turn) from your sins, and turn to Jesus. Ask Him to forgive you of your sins, and acknowledge Him as Lord of your life.

  • Start Immediately Without Rationalisation
  • Return Completely Without Reservation
  • Repent Openly Without Hesitation

 

With recognition of reliance upon the ministry of Adrian Rogers messages on marriage which have touched my heart so often.

 


Thursday, February 09, 2023

 

Scripture. Canon

THE BIBLE PART THREE
THE BIBLE: NOT AN AUTHORIZED COLLECTION OF BOOKS
BUT A COLLECTION OF AUTHORIZED BOOKS
Scripture says of itself it was "God breathed." The verb "breathed" translates the Greek. The expression uses language related to music. As an instrumentalist breathes the breath of air in one end of an instrument and it comes out the other end as a musical sound, so God breathed the breath of thought into the minds of authors and it came out though the human hand as written words. It came from God thought man to humankind. It was God's thought infused into each author's own vocabulary. A "word" is simply a vehicle by means of which thought is communicated from one mind to another. Thus, the Bible, God's Word, communicates from one mind, God's, to another, the author's. .
The exact spiritual means by which this was accomplished is a mystery.
Following are factors indicating the authenticity and reliability of the Bible as God's Word.
* Prophecy fulfilled, such as:
Prophecy Fulfillment
Jesus Born in Bethlehem Micah 5: 2 Luke 2: 4 - 7
Time of birth Daniel 9:: 25 Luke 2: 1, 2
Born of a virgin Isaiah 7: 14 Luke 1: 26
Slaughter of children Jeremiah 31: 15 Matthew 2: 16 - 18
Crucifixion Isaiah 53: 12 Mark 15: 27
Buried with the rich Isaiah 53: 9 Matthew 27: 57 – 60
Resurrection Psalm 16: 10 Mark 16: 6, 7
* The unity of the Book
The Bible consists of 66 books, written by more than 30 different authors, written over 1500 years, in four languages, in several countries, by men of every social strata, under varied circumstances. Yet, in all this conglomeration it has remarkable unity of thought.
* The historical life of the Book
No sooner than it was compiled attacks were made on it. Throughout its life every engine that human science, philosophy, wit, reasoning, or brutality has been unleashed against it.
* The psychological impact of the Book
If all psychologists were asked what are the basic needs of human beings a summary list of about 10 would be noted. They would include such needs as "love and affection," and "belonging." The Bible addresses all ten.
* The inexhaustible depth of the Book. Much is to be learned and much gained by each subsequent reading. George Muller has read it over 100 times and says it is more refreshing every time he reads it.
* The availability of basic manuscripts near the time of the writing.
Homers "Illiad" has 643 existing manuscripts the nearest to the event is 500 years. Caesar's "Gallic Wars" 10 early manuscripts exist, the closest to the events is 1,000 years. Aristotle wrote around 343 B.C. The earliest copy is dated 1100 A.D. Only five manuscripts exist. The New Testament, 25,000+ exist with the closest being 25 years. The records regarding the first two are considered reputable. Those consisting of the New Testament are even more creditable.

Wednesday, February 08, 2023

 

Dr Derksen


Living in the West, Connected to the East – Russian-Germans Caught Between Two Cultures?!

Living in the West, Connected to the East – Russian-Germans Caught Between Two Cultures?!

 

When my parents and I came to Germany in 1976, I had no idea how much coming from Russia would shape my life and my identity.  In Russia, we were called fascists and Germans.  Here in Germany, I heard in the schoolyard: "Those are the Russians!".  The few Russian-German children in elementary school stood out because of their language, clothing, and behavior.  We spoke German with an accent and made many mistakes.  We wore old clothing that had been given to us.  We also stood out because of our odd interactions.  This always challenged me as a child.  Who am I really?  German or Russian?  I am a German from Russia!  My hybrid cultural context has helped me to develop a "dual identity", which has often proved helpful.  It helps one to be more empathetic in dealing with other cultures and perspectives.

 

When large numbers of Germans immigrated from Russia at the end of the 80´s, intercultural challenges intensified again.  Within a few years, 2.5 million people from the former Soviet Union moved to Germany.  There was great tension between the migrants and mainstream society.  We frequently heard phrases like: "They are taking away our jobs.  They live at our expense.  They build houses because they get everything financed.  With their big families, they only benefit Aldi and Lidl."  Moreover, many found it difficult to understand this heterogeneous group.  Not all Russian-Germans are Germans from Russia.  There are multi-cultural and multi-national families.  The husband is Russian, the wife is German.  The husband is German, the wife has a Ukrainian father and a Russian mother.  This led to Russian being spoken at home in many families.  People enjoyed Russian dishes and listened to Russian music.  Many still had family members, friends, and acquaintances in Russia.  This created another bridge to their former "homeland."  Some, due to their language skills and experience in this region, have oriented their small businesses toward Russia and have established good relationships there.  But there are also many Russian Germans who have developed an inner aversion to Russia and the people there.  They were discriminated against and persecuted in Russia, so they want nothing more to do with that country.  They got rid of their Russian passports as quickly as possible, even though this was costly, because they wanted to integrate and assimilate in Germany.

 

While the Protestant and Catholic Russian-Germans were integrated into the national churches quickly, only a few free church members felt at home in the existing churches in Germany.  Because of this, at least 1200 free churches have been planted in the last 50 years.  These churches, often referred to as "prayer houses" can be easily identified.  They have typically been built in industrial areas using their own manpower.  The largest congregation in Bielefeld has well over 3000 members.  The churches are similarly as heterogeneous as the Russian-Germans as a whole.  There are at least 12 denominations, but over 50 percent of the churches are autonomous and self-sufficient and are not connected to any denomination.  There are three main streams that can be identified within the movement.  The exclusive churches keep to themselves and have quite restrictive church rules.  The conservative churches hold to a Russian-German understanding of church and the Bible, but they are open to other congregations and Christians.  The progressive churches have essentially assimilated and are often no longer perceived as Russian-German at all.  In this respect, the different streams do not collaborate directly with each other.  Some churches are well-integrated in the community; others live more segregated lives.

 

Up to this point, Russian-Germans have rarely been active in politics.  During my meeting with the former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, she asked me why this was so.  The reason is that in Russia the government was hostile to Christians and to Germans.  In the Soviet Union, people were discriminated against and disadvantaged.  People are very grateful that the German government grants freedom of religion and opinion but are only gradually beginning to see political involvement as an opportunity and a mission.  Heinrich Zertik (CDU) was the first Russian-German member of parliament in Germany from 2013-2017.  In the meantime, others have also become politically active in other parties at the federal, state, and local levels.  Nevertheless, many Russian-Germans remain critical of mainstream society, media, and politics.  During the Corona crisis, regulations were often perceived as threats to freedom.  Unfortunately, this has occasionally led to tensions between Russian-Germans and local governments, and in some places, has received negative media coverage.

 

In the current crisis in the Ukraine, only isolated voices, which have been influenced by Russian media, are pro-Putin.  The majority of Russian-Germans are against war and do not support Putin's aggression.  However, this does not mean that they reject the Russian people, Russia as their former homeland, or the Russian language, culture, and traditions.  The Russian-Germans may have moved from the East to the West, but the East has not moved out in the West.  Being drawn toward Russian culture does not mean being pro-Putin.  Unfortunately, this distinction is not often made in society, and so new aggression against Russian-Germans is again occurring sporadically, which is very regrettable.  The German Intelligence Service explicitly pointed out in a panel discussion, in which I was a participant, that Russian Germans are not a danger to Germany.  Russian Germans are fully-integrated and established professionally.  They are at home in Germany, but as a community they form a subculture on the basis of their historical roots.  They emigrated from Germany to Russia 250 years ago, preserved and cultivated their German culture there, and returned home shaped by their experiences and the Russian culture that surrounded them.  Yet if Germany as a pluralistic country claims to be multi-cultural and multi-religious, then Russian-Germans in Germany should also be part of society and not caught between two cultures.

 

Dr. Heinrich Derksen is the principal at the Biblical Seminary in Bonn/Germany and teaches practical theology, Greek and New Testament exegesis. He is also a member of the main board of the Evangelical Alliance Germany.


Tuesday, February 07, 2023

 

Abigail Chapter 8 Fascinating Lives

Almost every husband I know has a story about how his wife rescued him. I don't mean a dramatic feat of strength and cunning where she swoops in at the last moment to save him from some life-threatening disaster. Usually, she rescues him from himself. By her wisdom and tact, she keeps him from doing or saying something that he would later regret. In fact, I recall two particular situations that could have turned very ugly were it not for Cynthia's kind, understated but firm counsel.

Back when our youngest son, Chuck, was about to become a teenager, my involvement in preaching, publishing, teaching on the radio, being on the road, and church ministry was becoming more than I could handle. I hadn't learned the discipline of saying no, so I had days that kept me busy from very early in the morning to long past Chuck's bedtime. I say to my shame that my wife and children—the most important people in the world to me—were left with the crumbs of my time and energy.

Cynthia saw it long before I did and had been growing more concerned about one particular aspect of my neglect: our youngest, Chuck. Being the wise partner she is, she carefully selected the right moment to correct my perspective. When offering a reproof, remember that the goal is to be heard, not to prove that you're right and the other person is wrong. She knew my moods and when I would be able to hear her counsel without feeling attacked. And she presented it in a way that would give no reason for me to feel defensive.

"Are you aware of how much time you spent with Curt [our oldest son] and how little you're spending with Chuck?" she asked, "I remember looking out the front door several years ago and seeing you and Curt playing catch or touch football or batting practice until it was dark. And you were at most of his practices, all his games, and any special occasion that came along. But," she continued, "you very seldom do any of that with Chuck."

Even though she was right, I became defensive. I wasn't really open as I should have been . . . until I got alone and thought about it. Fortunately, the result of that rescuing experience was wonderful. She spoke at just the right time, which became a pivotal moment for me as a father and as a husband. That conversation led to a much closer relationship with Chuck than I would have had otherwise. She rescued me. Or, as we sometimes say, she saved my neck.

More recently, I found myself increasingly at odds with a brother in the Lord who lives in another state. The offense started small, but then a number of other events added to my agitated feelings. Even though we were close enough for me to bring it to his attention, I hadn't said anything. Then, something more significant happened that prompted me to sit down one Saturday afternoon and write a letter. I wanted it to be firm and fair, while leaving sufficient room for grace, so I edited it and then rewrote it. I did that more than a few times until it was just right. I spent well over two hours preparing my written reproof. I had other things to do, but this was important.

When I finished, I decided to sit down Saturday night and read it to Cynthia. We share almost everything, so this was par for the course. I read the letter with all the passion and feeling that had gone into my writing it. She listened and nodded her agreement with much of it as she affirmed my perspective. Clearly, she understood.

When I finished, she didn't say much, but she offered this advice: "You know, honey, if I were you, I would sleep on that letter before I mailed it. Everything you say is true, and I don't think it's exaggerated, but it's awfully strong. And I think you may regret it if you mail it."

Well, I didn't sleep on it. I lay awake on it—all night. It churned in my stomach as I turned in the bed. Early the next morning, I unfolded the letter and read it again. And before Sunday passed, I tore it up. I'm so glad I did. He didn't need my letter, and little of what I had to say would have been helpful in the long run. In fact, the issues were resolved through a set of circumstances that never would have happened if I had sent that written missile.

Once again, Cynthia saved her husband's neck. That's one of the great benefits to having a solid marriage, where the communication lines stay open. You can face the challenges of life with a partner who loves you unconditionally, who will look out for your very best, even when you can't . . . or won't.

THE WOMAN NAMED ABIGAIL AND THE MAN NAMED FOOL

 

This is the story of Abigail, the woman who saved her husband's neck. And I don't mean figuratively; I mean literally. She rescued him from a violent death, a peril he brought upon himself by his own foolishness. First Samuel 25 unfolds this account of passion, danger, irony, and intrigue. It reminds me of a classic Western movie, with wide-open country; gritty heroes on horses; a tough, beautiful heroine; and a crusty, hard-hearted villain who complicates life for everyone. Only this story is not fiction, and it revolves around three very complex, conflicted characters who wound up on a collision course. Allow me to introduce each of them.

THE HERO

 

Think of this as a movie. As the overture concludes, the camera pans across a vast, rugged wilderness, where might makes right and rough-hewn people survive without the help of government and laws. The camera slowly zooms in on a handsome, young warrior standing in front of several hundred battle-hardened soldiers. The warrior's name is David.

Then Samuel died; and all Israel gathered together and mourned for him, and buried him at his house in Ramah. And David arose and went down to the wilderness of Paran.

1 SAMUEL 25:1

 

By this time, David had killed Goliath, received his anointing as the king of Israel, and taken to living in the wilderness to avoid jealous King Saul, whose heart was set on murder. We read of Saul's long, slow decent into evil in the previous chapter. Part of that downfall was his utter contempt for David, who had served him faithfully. Instead of showing gratitude, Saul turned on the young man and wound up trying to murder him. For years, David lived in the most rugged places in Israel, places that were too difficult for an army to survive long enough to track him down.

As I wrote in the first chapter, David attracted a band of four hundred fighting men, whom he trained in the cave of Adullum. By the time of this story, that number has grown to six hundred. These were sharp, seasoned warriors living on the edge of trouble; but under David's leadership, the random collection of malcontents had become a disciplined fighting force. After moving to the wilderness of Paran, they became the self-appointed peacekeepers and lawmen of the region. Their services were both needed and appreciated.

The wilderness of Paran lay to the very far south of Israel, down below the Dead Sea, just above Sinai. We would call it no man's land. It was too far from anything to be influenced by government, so anyone living there had to fend for themselves. Any flocks or herds that grazed in the wilderness of Paran would become victims of thievery or wild beasts were it not for David and his troops. Fortunately for the businessmen who owned herds and flocks, these men had taken it upon themselves to police the southern frontier.

This arrangement was not without tradition, and the custom was that the peacekeepers would not demand payment for their services. However, as a matter of integrity, the businessmen would voluntarily offer compensation out of gratitude. To withhold payment would be like failing to tip a waitress for the service she provides. If she does a fair job, the tip would be modest. If she does a great job, the tip should be generous. In this case, the protection that David provided was superb. None of the herds or flocks were harmed. None of them were taken by thieves. Since sheep-shearing time was payday, it was the right time to gently remind the businessmen of the protection they enjoyed.

THE ANTAGONIST

 

Now imagine that the scene shifts from the wilderness to the trading center of Carmel, where businessmen gather to buy and trade. Bales of wool are being loaded onto beasts of burden in the background, while a shrewd entrepreneur, wearing the very finest clothes and a satisfied smile, fondles a silver coin—one of the many he made that day. His eyes are hard. He's savvy in the ways of making money, but in every other respect, he's boorish and smug. Despite his condescending manner, he's very popular . . . because he's very rich.

Now there was a man in Maon whose business was in Carmel; and the man was very rich, and he had three thousand sheep and a thousand goats. And it came about while he was shearing his sheep in Carmel (now the man's name was Nabal, and his wife's name was Abigail. And the woman was intelligent and beautiful in appearance, but the man was harsh and evil in his dealings, and he was a Calebite.)

1 SAMUEL 25:2–3

 

The name Nabal is the Hebrew word for "fool." It's the same word used throughout the proverbs and other wisdom literature to refer to churlish, rude, ignorant, dishonest, belligerent, obstinate, stupid people. It's unlikely that this was the name given to him by his mother. The biblical writer may have used this as a nickname for the man, but it also could have been the name people used behind his back. Verse 3 is a parenthetical aside to the reader, in which the writer says, "Oh, by the way, the man's name is Fool."

Regardless of how he came by his name, Nabal lived up to it. He was a bigoted, stubborn, rigid, prejudiced, and underhanded businessman. On top of it all, the man was a tightwad. Aside from all that, I suppose we could say that Nabal was a fine gentleman.

THE HEROINE

 

Finally, the scene fades from the bustling trade center in Carmel to a homestead just a few miles south in Maon. The music softens, and a stunningly beautiful woman steps into the picture. Her dark hair and exquisite features frame a pair of eyes that only hint at the wisdom at work behind them. She is as industrious and ingenious as she is beautiful. Her name is Abigail, which means "my father is joy."

Though the woman was intelligent and beautiful, her husband was harsh and dishonest in his dealings. From our modern perspective, we wonder how a woman like Abigail could end up married to a klutz like Nabal. The irony here is painful. A woman having noticeable wisdom, married to a loser named Fool. But in those days, marriage was a business arrangement between fathers, not the culmination of courtship and love like today. Now, don't believe what the revisionists of history would tell you. Most of the time, the marriage worked out beautifully. Fathers loved their daughters and took great care to choose a man who would not only provide for and care for his daughter, but love her and treat her tenderly. And almost always, a genuine love grew between the couple very quickly.

However, people then, just as today, could be fooled. Abigail sounds like she came from a good home, but her father didn't see the obvious character flaws in his future son-in-law. This was a terrible marriage and, as a result, Abigail suffered. But you wouldn't know it to see her.

THE CRISIS

 

As the story unfolds, we can see and admire Abigail's display of remarkable poise and keen judgment:

And it came about while he was shearing his sheep in Carmel . . . that David heard in the wilderness that Nabal was shearing his sheep. So David sent ten young men; and David said to the young men, "Go up to Carmel, visit Nabal and greet him in my name; and thus you shall say, 'Have a long life, peace be to you, and peace be to your house, and peace be to all that you have. Now I have heard that you have shearers; now your shepherds have been with us and we have not insulted them, nor have they missed anything all the days they were in Carmel. Ask your young men and they will tell you. Therefore let my young men find favor in your eyes, for we have come on a festive day. Please give whatever you find at hand to your servants and to your son David.'"

When David's young men came, they spoke to Nabal according to all these words in David's name; then they waited.

1 SAMUEL 25:2, 4–9

 

I appreciate the tactful way David went about this. First, he didn't gallop at full tilt to Carmel with all six hundred men on stallions, demanding payment. This is a quiet reminder that Nabal's profit at the market would not have been nearly as high were it not for David's protection. Furthermore, David extended remarkable honor to the man, recognizing his station as a nobleman. And he did it with incredible humility, considering that the throne of Israel would one day be his. Don't miss the fact that he didn't expect a specific amount. The request was, in essence, "Give whatever you think is fair."

If this were a bill, I would call it a very gracious, considerate statement. I don't remember ever getting anything like this from the people who manage the electric company.

Dear Mr. Swindoll,

Peace be upon your home and to your family. You have enjoyed electricity in your home, lo, these many weeks. Since we have expenses we must pay, do you think you might be able to help us with those? Please return the enclosed envelope with anything you care to send.

May God bless you,
Your humble servants at the power company

 

I think I'd faint. Normally it says, "Pay now! Put it in here! Send it by this date, or we'll shut your power off and charge you an extra heap to turn it back on!" David didn't do that. He said, in effect, "Send whatever you think is fair and we will receive it with gratitude. Shalom."

Nabal's response could not have been more insulting:

But Nabal answered David's servants and said, "Who is David? And who is the son of Jesse? There are many servants today who are each breaking away from his master. Shall I then take my bread and my water and my meat that I have slaughtered for my shearers, and give it to men whose origin I do not know?" So David's young men retraced their way and went back; and they came and told him according to all these words.

1 SAMUEL 25:10–12

 

Take note of Nabal's response. Look for clues to his character. Don't be fooled by his first question. He knew very well who David was. This was meant to disparage David as having no pedigree. Nabal, on the other hand, was a direct descendant and heir of the great Caleb, something akin to having George Washington as your ancestor with the deed to Mount Vernon in your name. Caleb stood with Joshua during the Exodus and urged Israel to take Canaan as the Lord promised. Later, after the wilderness wandering, at the age of eighty-five, he stood in the southern frontier of the land and said, "Give me that hill country!"

Asking, "Who is David?" and "Who is the son of Jesse?" was a calculated slap in the face—both for David and his lineage. Of course, we know that David was destined to become Israel's king, but very few people knew that at the time. So, this was like saying, "You're a nobody! You come from nothing. Who are you to be talking to someone as important as I?"

Nabal's next comment takes aim at David and his followers. It was a very clever jab insinuating that they were all no better than slaves (the lowest people in society), and that they were a ragtag rabble who were disloyal to both Saul and Israel.

Then he completed the insult with a final flourish. "Shall I then take my bread and my water and my meat that I have slaughtered for my shearers, and give it to men whose origin I do not know?" In other words, "I prefer to give the reward of labor to those who earned it, not a bunch of hooligans trying to extort a living from real producers like me."

Notice the response of David's men. No fighting. No arguing. They simply leave.

Nabal went back to trading, socializing, and reveling in the success earned in part by David. Being habitually oblivious, he probably thought everything would carry on as usual. While the festival in Carmel continued, an emotional earthquake shook the desert, and David was its epicenter. He was not yet the mature man of God that he would become. It would take many more years in the desert to temper his steel. He was still rough and uneven. In 1 Samuel 24, he showed supernatural restraint in sparing the life of Saul, whom he still regarded as "the Lord's anointed." But in chapter 25, we see a different David. The heart of a passionate man of war beats his chest. And the impudent response from the thankless Nabal brought out the worst in him.

This was not David's best moment. His reaction was a rash act of the flesh, not a prompting by the Spirit of God. The Lord may act severely and His judgment may be swift, but He is never rash.

Let me offer this as a quick aside. Be careful to test what you may think to be a prompting from the Lord. He doesn't speak to us audibly as He did in those days, and what may feel like a compelling unction from the Holy Spirit may just as well be your own hidden desire. It is true that you have living within you the Holy Spirit of Almighty God, and He always gives good guidance. But you also carry with you many pounds of carnal flesh that makes wrong seem right. A transformed mind will tell the difference, but that doesn't take place overnight. Maturity comes with time and experience; it's a product of a growing intimacy with the Almighty.

So I urge you to put your promptings to the test. The Lord will honor His truth by confirming it for you. Refuse to act impulsively. Instead, weigh your words carefully, sleep on decisions having significant consequences, and remain open to reproof. Does Scripture affirm the wisdom and morality of your choice? Do the wise, godly people in your life have any objections? What has your own past experience taught you? Have you asked the Lord to examine your heart over the matter and then prayed quietly?

David did none of that. Instead he issued the order, "Each of you gird on his sword." He left two hundred troops to guard the camp, while four hundred and one took off in a cloud of dust for the shearing festival in Carmel. Soon the ground outside Nabal's tent would be soaked with his blue blood. And not only his, but that of his sons too. This was a massacre in the making.

THE PLOT DEEPENS

 

Meanwhile, an unnamed servant who overheard Nabal's insults slipped silently out of Carmel to alert Abigail. Notice that he didn't talk to Nabal. You get nowhere talking to a man named Fool. But he knew that Abigail would listen because that's what intelligent people do. They listen—especially to servants:

But one of the young men told Abigail, Nabal's wife, saying, "Behold, David sent messengers from the wilderness to greet our master, and he scorned them. Yet the men were very good to us, and we were not insulted, nor did we miss anything as long as we went about with them, while we were in the fields. They were a wall to us both by night and by day, all the time we were with them tending the sheep. Now therefore, know and consider what you should do, for evil is plotted against our master and against all his household; and he is such a worthless man that no one can speak to him."

1 SAMUEL 25:14–17

 

That last statement is telling, isn't it? I'm taken back by how casually the servant speaks of Nabal's worthlessness to his wife. Yet, in Hebrew culture, she must show him honor and respect, both in private and with his servants. What an awful existence. How tragic it is to live under the authority of a person who won't listen and doesn't even have his servants' respect.

Do you live with someone like that? Were you reared by a mother or father who simply could not be wrong? Do you have a grown child, now an adult, who will not listen? Do you have a spouse who is completely out of touch with how he or she affects others? If so, then you understand why that is one of the most difficult situations in life to endure. You can't get through to them. You know before you begin to communicate that they're going to shut out your words. And they have a dozen reasons why what you say is wrong. Nabals still exist.

Allow me an extra measure of imagination with this next comment, OK? Abigail could have thought, Oh, my. David's on his way to kill Fool? God moves in mysterious ways, His wonders to perform! But she didn't go there. And I'm impressed with her integrity. She chose to protect her husband, not because he deserved it, not because he was good, but because she was good. Despite how bad a husband he had been, she chose to remain honorable in her role as his partner . . . even when he was not present.

If you're in a situation similar to Abigail's, you know how hard that is to do. And you may be growing weary, wondering, How long, Lord? You may have periodically given up and behaved poorly—reacting with hostility or subtly getting revenge here and there. I don't mean to judge your reaction as I convey what Scripture teaches by Abigail's model. She could very easily have done nothing, and we would have little cause to blame her. But her incredible response is worthy of study and emulation. Amazingly, she immediately put a plan in motion that would protect her husband from harm. This is one remarkable lady!

Then Abigail hurried and took two hundred loaves of bread and two jugs of wine and five sheep already prepared and five measures of roasted grain and a hundred clusters of raisins and two hundred cakes of figs, and loaded them on donkeys. She said to her young men, "Go on before me; behold, I am coming after you." But she did not tell her husband Nabal.

1 SAMUEL 25:18–19

 

She put together a meal big enough to feed an army . . . literally! No one prompted her; no one suggested she intercede for her husband. In fact, she never told him what she was doing. Of course, he probably would have stopped her if she had. This intelligent, beautiful, unselfish woman moved to save her husband's neck because that's what a good mate does. And all the while, she was mentally preparing her speech for David.

THE CLIMAX

 

It came about as she was riding on her donkey and coming down by the hidden part of the mountain, that behold, David and his men were coming down toward her; so she met them. Now David had said, "Surely in vain I have guarded all that this man has in the wilderness, so that nothing was missed of all that belonged to him; and he has returned me evil for good. May God do so to the enemies of David, and more also, if by morning I leave as much as one male of any who belong to him." When Abigail saw David, she hurried and dismounted from her donkey, and fell on her face before David and bowed herself to the ground.

1 SAMUEL 25:20–23

 

All of the tension in the story has been building to this moment. The two men were about as opposite as men can be, yet they have behaved in similar ways. Both were obstinate, proud men. Each believed the other to be a fool. Both allowed anger to rule their judgment. Each shot off his mouth about the other. Both acted rashly, led by impulse rather than good sense. But here, at the climax of the story, who did Abigail approach to resolve the conflict?

Her only hope was to appeal to David. She knew that speaking to Nabal would change nothing. Her speech is a classic example of a persuasive address in the Near East, and it drips with wisdom. Her primary goal is to remind David of his identity as the Lord's anointed, then she urges him to behave accordingly. Read the following slowly, thoughtfully:

She fell at his feet and said, "On me alone, my lord, be the blame. And please let your maidservant speak to you, and listen to the words of your maidservant. Please do not let my lord pay attention to this worthless man, Nabal, for as his name is, so is he. Nabal is his name and folly is with him; but I your maidservant did not see the young men of my lord whom you sent.

"Now therefore, my lord, as the LORD lives, and as your soul lives, since the LORD has restrained you from shedding blood, and from avenging yourself by your own hand, now then let your enemies and those who seek evil against my lord, be as Nabal. Now let this gift which your maidservant has brought to my lord be given to the young men who accompany my lord. Please forgive the transgression of your maidservant; for the LORD will certainly make for my lord an enduring house, because my lord is fighting the battles of the LORD, and evil will not be found in you all your days. Should anyone rise up to pursue you and to seek your life, then the life of my lord shall be bound in the bundle of the living with the LORD your God; but the lives of your enemies He will sling out as from the hollow of a sling. And when the LORD does for my lord according to all the good that He has spoken concerning you, and appoints you ruler over Israel, this will not cause grief or a troubled heart to my lord, both by having shed blood without cause and by my lord having avenged himself. When the LORD deals well with my lord, then remember your maidservant."

1 SAMUEL 25:24–31, emphasis added

 

In effect, she said, "David, look ahead! You're not even thirty! You can afford to return good for evil because you are God's choice to become the king of Israel. Don't stain your reputation before you take the throne. Our God will bless you if you behave like the king you are. Besides, the battle is the Lord's. Let Him deal with Nabal."

Now observe David's response:

Then David said to Abigail, "Blessed be the LORD God of Israel, who sent you this day to meet me, and blessed be your discernment, and blessed be you, who have kept me this day from bloodshed and from avenging myself by my own hand. Nevertheless, as the LORD God of Israel lives, who has restrained me from harming you, unless you had come quickly to meet me, surely there would not have been left to Nabal until the morning light as much as one male."

1 SAMUEL 25:32–34

 

Two bullheaded men were about to clash over what was essentially a common courtesy, and David was ready to murder a man because he wounded his pride. In this story, we don't see much of a difference in character between David and Nabal . . . until the climax. The difference is small, but it makes all the difference. Whereas Nabal wouldn't listen to reproof, David did. Don't miss the profound gratitude he expressed to Abigail. She not only saved her husband's neck, but she also saved David's. F. B. Meyer, in his chapter on David, appropriately calls this episode in David's Life, "A Cool Hand on a Hot Head."1

Scripture calls David "a man after God's heart." Obviously that can't mean that he was perfect, as this story clearly illustrates. He was impatient. He was rash. He was passionate. He was a man who had many women before his death. Far from being perfect, being a man after God's heart means that whatever touches the heart of God also touches the heart of David. Whatever moves God to acts of compassion or judgment also moves David. The heart of David beat in sync with God's. Abigail reminded the future king of this relationship with the Lord, and as she spoke, his anger melted away.

So David received from her hand what she had brought him and said to her, "Go up to your house in peace. See, I have listened to you and granted your request."

1 SAMUEL 25:35

 

Catastrophe averted. Nabal lives to insult again, and David avoids gaining a reputation for being a capricious tyrant before taking the throne. And both men have the wisdom and tact of Abigail to thank.

The end.

Wait. That's a wonderful story as it is. But there's more. Obedience usually requires us to sacrifice something we want in favor of what God desires. And when we obey, He delights to surprise us with a far greater blessing than the one we gave up. This story is no exception:

Then Abigail came to Nabal, and behold, he was holding a feast in his house, like the feast of a king. And Nabal's heart was merry within him, for he was very drunk; so she did not tell him anything at all until the morning light.

1 SAMUEL 25:36

 

After this courageous act of wisdom and grace, wouldn't it have been wonderful if Abigail could have come home to tell Nabal what she had done for him? Even better, wouldn't it have been great if he had put his arms around her and thanked her for saving his neck? Instead she came home to a beer party and a drunk husband. He had no idea that death was breathing down his collar just a few hours before. He had no idea how great a prize he had in the person of Abigail. In fact, considering her situation, she would have been much better off to allow Nabal's foolishness to catch up to him and take his life.

My heart goes out to mismatched mates, who struggle to make it through the week, craving the slightest affirmation. If that's where you are, you're still waiting for kind words to come your way. I've dealt with married couples in which one partner or the other is all-consuming in his or her selfishness. So self-centered, self-contained, self-concerned, not even gracious enough to recognize the everyday blessing of a faithful mate.

Let me go a step further. I've buried some people only to have their mates whisper to me, "I don't know why it just now dawns on me all the things she meant to me." In light of that, allow me to offer this simple advice: don't wait until your husband or wife is gone before you say, "Thank you for all you do. I don't even want to think about what life would be without you. I love you." In fact, be specific. Name the reasons you appreciate your partner.

Poor Abigail didn't receive any of that. Seeing her husband's condition, she decided to let him sleep it off. It's probable that after the hours of preparation, riding, pleading, and after the sudden release of emotions, this wonderful woman fell into her bed, exhausted, and cried herself to sleep. The music and the drunken howls of Nabal and his cohorts no doubt drowned out the sensible voice in her head telling her that she did the right thing. She saved her vile husband's neck by appealing to the honor of the man—a real man—who would have freed her from future heartache.

But in the morning, when the wine had gone out of Nabal, his wife told him these things, and his heart died within him so that he became as a stone. About ten days later, the LORD struck Nabal and he died.

1 SAMUEL 25:37–38

 

I want to proceed with caution and avoid misapplying Scripture. We have to accept that this story, like many in the Bible, describes extraordinary events in order to teach us important principles. The death of any human being is not something to be taken lightly; but frankly, if this were a movie, the audience would be cheering.

THE RESOLUTION

 

David left justice in the hands of God. Abigail entrusted her future to Him. Both sacrificed a foreseeable future that looked attractive to them, yet they chose to do what was right. After the Lord brought justice down on the man named Fool, His plan could be seen clearly. It was there all the while, standing just behind the door of obedience.

If you're a fan of fairytale endings, you'll love this story. If this were the last few minutes of a movie, you don't want the credits to roll with Abigail wasting away in front of her tent, watching sheep graze in the distance. Where's the "happily ever after" in that? Take note of David's reaction to the news:

When David heard that Nabal was dead, he said, "Blessed be the LORD, who has pleaded the cause of my reproach from the hand of Nabal and has kept back His servant from evil. The LORD has also returned the evildoing of Nabal on his own head." Then David sent a proposal to Abigail, to take her as his wife. When the servants of David came to Abigail at Carmel, they spoke to her, saying, "David has sent us to you to take you as his wife." She arose and bowed with her face to the ground and said, "Behold, your maidservant is a maid to wash the feet of my lord's servants." Then Abigail quickly arose, and rode on a donkey, with her five maidens who attended her; and she followed the messengers of David and became his wife.

1 SAMUEL 25:39–42

 

Once David stepped through the door of obedience, he saw the Lord's plan and pursued the blessing that lay before him. Abigail wasted no time either. I can't blame either of them! Abigail's actions demonstrated that she was an extraordinary woman, a wife that a king would be a fool to overlook. David's actions demonstrated that he was a real man—a man strong enough to realize he was wrong to take a wise rebuke to heart, examine his choices, trust the Lord, and do what is right in God's eyes.

Some might question the timing. Nabal's funeral is barely over and these two have known each other for only minutes. But don't forget that these are not twenty-first-century, urbanite lovers. Marriage in those days was motivated more by honor and duty than love. Ancient Near Eastern society was not kind to widows, even rich ones. And life on the southern frontier of Israel was a dangerous place for anyone not equipped to fight.

David saw a widow in need, who also happened to be an uncommonly good and insightful woman. Abigail saw a protector to preserve her estate, who also happened to be a man after God's heart. This was a match made in heaven.

Over the years, I have learned that, when making big decisions, tradition and conventional wisdom should be taken seriously. Grieving the loss of a mate takes time, usually about three years (some suggest five) before a person can even begin to think and function normally, much less contribute to a new relationship. I have seen far too many jump out there too quickly, and someone's heart winds up getting crushed. My advice: listen! Listen to those wise people who love you and have demonstrated that they have your best interest in first place. If they say wait, then wait.

On the other hand, let's be careful about etching those hard-and-fast rules in stone. Tradition and conventional wisdom should be taken seriously, but let's leave room for God to do the unusual. Miracles are, by their very nature, precious and rare enough without our trying to quash them. David and Abigail demonstrated uncommon faith, choosing to set aside a future they would make for themselves. Consequently, God moved quickly to bless both of them rather than make them wait.

THE MORALS OF THE STORY

 

Each character points us to a lasting lesson. After all, God's stories are not merely for entertainment, though the entertainment value is high. He preserved these narratives for our spiritual development.

From David, we learn that rash reactions never pay off. David's quick-tempered reaction almost led him to murder. Just think, if David had killed Nabal in a fit of passion, his proposal and marriage to Abigail would have tainted his reputation. I can only imagine how differently Israel's history might have played out if David had failed this test of self-control. Thanks be to God that he was the kind of man who would listen to others.

For all I know, even as you read this, you have a plan that you are ready to put into operation. It's a passionate act. I warn you, if it's rash, it's wrong. Stop! Rash actions never pay off. Think through the consequences. Sleep on it. Seek wise counsel . . . and then listen. You've spent your time only on one side of the dilemma. Force yourself to look at it through another set of eyes. If you find yourself frequently on the defensive, and you're feeling all alone in your perspective, recognize that your perspective is the one that should be doubted. Act on raw and shallow emotions, and you are going to bring pain on yourself that will hurt for years to come.

From Nabal we learn that insensitive mates leave untold heartache all around them. This applies to wives who rob their husbands of dignity and respect with their continual criticism and generally dismissive attitude. Don't fool yourself into thinking that because you love him, he doesn't need to feel your respect and admiration. To him, love and respect are the same. When you criticize him, or insult him, or fail to trust him, it causes untold heartache. The tragedy is that you may never know it. (Don't ask him. He won't tell you.)

This applies to husbands who strip their wives of self-worth and value by dismissing their counsel and failing to see their positive qualities. Communication is to a woman what physical intimacy is to a man. To dismiss her when she talks is no less demoralizing to her than when she rejects your advances. Do that over a long enough period of time, and she will eventually get the message and stop trying, just like Abigail. And, trust me, men, when a woman stops trying to talk to you, your marriage is in deep trouble. The tragedy is that some of you may never know it. Your own insensitivity is keeping you in the dark.

Let me take this a step further. Your insensitivity not only crushes your wife, but it could also lead to your own destruction. Nabal remained insensitive to those who protected his flock. And the earthquake that shook the hills of Paran could have led to his own demise. He was also insensitive to his wife so that when he was in danger, she could not even come to him with the warning.

If you happen to be a Nabal, please . . . wake up! God has given you a gift beyond compare in that wife of yours. He's given her a gift for insight, which I have learned to heed from my wife in our fifty years of marriage. I became much more successful once I began giving my wife's perspective equal weight with my own.

From Abigail we learn that wise partners make the best use of timing and tact. When Abigail sensed danger, no one had to tell her to move swiftly. Wisdom knows when to slow down and evaluate all angles of a situation, and also when to seize a moment before it slips away. She hurried to put that meal together. She acted swiftly to catch the moment before it was gone. Almost without exception, timing is everything.

And when she saw murder in David's eyes, she spoke courageously, though calmly. She carefully chose her words, not to win the argument, but to put David in the very best position to hear and heed her counsel. And when she finished her task, she returned home without speaking a word to Nabal. It wasn't the right time. First light was better.

As you turn the last page of this chapter, do yourself a favor. Bookmark this place, put the book down, and ask your married partner several pointed questions. I'll suggest a few to get you started, or you can come up with your own, then simply listen. Listen. Don't defend, don't try to explain how he or she came by that opinion. Listen.

Start with these questions:

• When do I make you feel good about yourself and us? When do I make you feel the worst?

• If you could change one thing about yourself, what would it be? What would you want changed about me?

• If I am about to make a terrible mistake, how likely are you to tell me? What would keep you from doing that?

• Do you feel like I value your judgment? Please be honest with me. I want to know.

 

One more time, let me urge you to listen to the mate God has given you. Who knows? One day he or she may save your neck. Literally!

 

 

 

QUESTIONS FOR GROWTH GROUPS

Receiving advice can be hard.  When you need counsel to whom do you turn?

Prov 27:6        Faithful are the wounds of a friend, But the kisses of an enemy are deceitful.

1.When has a wound helped you?

 

2.What words in the text introduce Nabal? 

 

3.What provoked David to a rash reaction?

 

4.Proverbs 15: 1 A soft answer turns away wrath, But a harsh word stirs up anger.

How does this verse summarise the situation?

 

5.In 1 Samuel verses 23-31 how does Abigail appeal to David against acting violently?

 

6.How was David's heart changed?

 

7."Rash Reactions Never Pay Off"… please explain.

 

8.How do we find God's will when we are provoked?

 

9.How has this study been helpful to you?

 


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?


Free Hit Counter